nvidia graphics cards comparison 960 1070

#NVIDIA GRAPHICS CARDS COMPARISON 960 1070 1080P#

It’s not really practical on any level to try this.

Give up hope yee that follow the GTX 960 beyond this point! 4K had only existed in televisions for 2 years before the 900-Series was released, so they’re not exactly equipped to tackle this kind of pixel-heavy workload.Ī GTX 960 in 4K will probably achieve an average of 16fps. Across a number of games, you can expect it to muster an average of around 28fps, while the 1060 – also not really thriving – can hit around 48.7, amounting to a gigantic 75% 1440p victory.

It won’t be a shock to anyone, but we’ll say it anyway.

#NVIDIA GRAPHICS CARDS COMPARISON 960 1070 1080P#

Drawing victories ranging from 16% (CSGO) to 64% (WoT, PUBG), and securing an overall win of 46%, 1080p is a triumph for the 1060. We are, of course, being kind, as truthfully – and we can’t stress this enough – the 1060 slaughters the 960 no matter the game. During CSGO and League of Legends, it breaks the 100fps average with no problems at all, and during Minecraft, it hits an impressive 180fps. It doesn’t win a thing, god bless its silicone soul, falling below the 40fps zone during challenging games such as The Witcher 3, but it pumps out some serious frames on certain titles. The GTX 960 performs admirably in 1080p on max settings. Both GPUs have 8GB of DDR5 and although they share the same processing core (GP104), the 1070 has 25 of its resources disabled. In terms of performance the gap between the flagship 10 averages 25. As a result of the die shrink from 28 to 16 nm, Pascal based cards are more energy efficient than their predecessors. We could talk specs all day, but it’s all just words and numbers on a screen until we see what kind of performance they facilitate, so without further ado, let’s get down to the good stuff. The GTX 1070 is Nvidia’s second graphics card (after the 1080) to feature the new 16 nm Pascal architecture. From the 900-Series card’s base of 1127MHz and boost of 1178MHz, we move upwards to a base of 1506MHz and a boost clock of 1709MHz. Clock speeds are also vastly improved on the Pascal card. The 1060 continues to peacock bolstered specs afforded by its Pascal variant, featuring 25% more texture units (80 vs 64), 4.4 billion transistors to the 960s 2.94 billion, 16 more render units (48 vs 32), 10 SMs to the 960s 8, and a much improved L2 cache (1536KB vs 1024KB). If you take into account the improvements made to each Pascal core, it’ll be an even larger differential. Moving on to the specific variants in question, you’ll see that the 1060 offers 256 more CUDA cores than the 960, a differential of 25%. It offered improvements in the form of unified memory, twice as many registers per CUDA core, and advanced color compression. The GTX 10-Series, on the other hand, features the GP106-400-A1 variant of Nvidia’s much-beloved Pascal microarchitecture that enhanced performance by a proportionally larger degree than Maxwell did when it succeeded Kepler. The GTX 900-Series was the first and only GPU family to be built on Nvidia’s Maxwell architecture, showing a marked improvement in graphics capabilities and energy efficiency. Being from completely different GPU families, there are some serious differences between the 9’s microarchitecture.

Nvidia graphics cards comparison 960 1070